‘Ban the Cams’ initiative stalled by stolen signs

The push to ban red light cameras in Murrieta has taken a mysterious turn after more than a dozen signs promoting the initiative have been stolen from residential yards.

The push to ban red light cameras in Murrieta has taken a mysterious turn after more than a dozen signs promoting the initiative have been stolen from residential yards. (Courtesy photo)

“This kind of thing happens in every campaign, but now it’s (happening) on people’s property,” said Diana Serafin.

Serafin, who collected signatures as a part of a grassroots effort to place the measure on the November ballot, said that she has placed about 150 of the signs throughout the city, and that 20 of the signs have disappeared — some within an hour or so of having been displayed or replaced.

One was found tossed into some nearby bushes.

“I went to corner houses in residential neighborhoods and asked if I could put up the signs,” Serafin said.

She added that the locations — some on Whitewood Road — were chosen for their visibility on local streets and each of the homeowners had granted permission for the signs to be displayed.

“We’re supposed to be a safe city and I want to stress we’re not,” she said. “The police have to patrol and watch. I am feeling discouraged.”

Murrieta residents will decide the issue of whether or not to keep red light cameras this fall after an appeals court in August issued a stay of a previous order that would have kept the measure off the November ballot.

Read: Petition to ban red light cameras in Murrieta gaining speed

The initiative has been hotly debated in neighborhoods and in the courtroom.

On Aug. 10, the California Fourth District Court of Appeal announced a stay of Riverside County Superior Court Judge Daniel A. Ottolia’s decision handed down on Aug. 3, that initially deemed the ballot initiative illegal.

Also of note to Serafin, is word of a possible phone survey that is being conducted to see what the public’s feeling is regarding the red light controversy.

“My suspicion is that this is coming from some company, maybe the city, because you need money to run a poll,” Serafin said.

Read: Murrieta residents weigh in on red light camera controversy

Serafin said that the effort to ban the cameras stems from a belief that they are a costly  violation of civil rights.

“You’ll never stop a drunk or someone texting from running a light. If we can make (intersections) safer, I am all for it,” she said.

Murrieta has three red light cameras — one at the intersection of Murrieta Hot Springs and Whitewood roads, one at Murrieta Hot Springs and Margarita roads, and another at Clinton Keith Road and Nutmeg Street.

Kerri S. Mabee can be reached at kerri.mabee@swrnn.com. Follow me on Twitter @kerrimabee.

 

 

 

3 comments to ‘Ban the Cams’ initiative stalled by stolen signs

  • Henry

    Everyone in California needs to know about Snitch Tickets, which are fake/phishing red light camera tickets sent out by the police in an effort to fool the registered owner into identifying the actual driver of the car. (In SoCal, Bakersfield, Corona, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Garden Grove, Hawthorne, Inglewood, Laguna Woods, Los Alamitos, Oceanside, Poway, Riverside, Santa Ana, Santa Clarita, Solana Beach, South Gate, Victorville and Vista use them.) Snitch tickets have not been filed with the court, so they don’t say “Notice to Appear,” don’t have the court’s address and phone # on them, and usually say, on the back (in small letters), “Do not contact the court about this notice.” Since they have not been filed with the court, they have no legal weight whatsoever. You can, and should, ignore a Snitch Ticket. If in doubt, Google the term.

    Also, a REAL camera ticket from ANY city in LA County can be ignored, as the LA courts do not report ignored tickets to the DMV. (This was revealed in multiple LA Times articles last summer. It is applicable ONLY to cities in LA county.)

  • Stephen

    SOME “company”, mean ATS maybe??

    Regardless the last time a poll was tested claiming “support” for RLC was Houston TX.

    The poll claimed “support”,,http://www.khou.com/home/Poll–Red-light-cameras-cruising-to-victory-drainage-fee-going-down-106342859.html

    THE VOTERS BANNED THE RLC THE LATER THAT FALL! ATS THEN SUED TO STOP THE BAN! http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Judge-halts-Houston-s-red-light-camera-removal-1595684.php

    FIGHT THE RLC FRAUD!

    BAN THE CAMS!

    http://www.motorists.org
    http://www.banthecams.org
    camerafraud on Facebook

  • Cities and camera companies fight desperately, and sometimes in dirty ways, to prevent actual votes on ticket cameras because the cameras have lost 96% of the votes so far. It is almost certain that Murietta voters will say GOODBYE to the predatory money-grab camera scam.

    James C. Walker, National Motorists Association, Ann Arbor, MI

 

SWRNN Polls

Which White House scandal is the most worrisome?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...