Controversy growing over Riverside school district decision to ban dictionary


Tuesday, January 26, 2010
San Diego: Students in some Riverside County schools are now without certain dictionaries, as the district banned them.

Students in some Riverside County schools are now without certain dictionaries, as the district banned them.

Officials with the Menifee Union School District say the growing controversy over the removal of a dictionary from the classroom has led to the misconception that all dictionaries have been pulled.

The district is responding to the controversy that is attracting national and international media coverage after officials temporarily removed copies of Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary Tenth Edition for containing graphic terms like “oral sex.”

A parent volunteer working in her son’s classroom came across the term, according to Betti Cadmus, and submitted a written complaint to the school’s principal, who contacted the assistant superintendent of curriculum.

The complaint resulted in the district removing the dictionaries from the fourth- and fifth-grade reference section at Oak Meadows Elementary School, which Cadmus said Monday was the only district school to be using that dictionary.

“One of the misconceptions is that all dictionaries are being banned from our district,” Cadmus said. “That could not be farther from the truth. There are dictionaries available for use at all school sites; the dictionaries (in question) are still on site, but are temporarily not in use.”

Cadmus said it was not just one parent that complained, but that there was a growing parent concern at Oak Meadows Elementary over the explicit term, which it turns out was not contained in the dictionary; though other words that might be considered age-inappropriate were found.

Joan Bertin, executive director for the New York-based National Coalition against Censorship — an organization that offers education and advocacy around free speech issues — said this is precisely what the First Amendment is supposed to prevent.

“Removing a book should be based solely on its educational value, not on whether a few parents think it is a good or bad thing,” Bertin said. “On that theory, you would only have ‘Dick and Jane’ left in the library.”

“We don’t think it is a good idea to remove dictionaries,” Bertin said. “It is a dictionary; its value is neutral. This just boggles my mind.”

The term “oral sex,” which the initial parent complaint was about, is not a term that is never heard or written, Bertin said.

“What are we going to do, remove the word ‘intercourse’?” Bertin said.

“Pre-teens and teenagers are very curious, as that is what coming up for them,” she said. “But reading about undesirable things gives them a way to find out what it is without actually doing it.”

A committee to review the dictionary and decide if it should be permanently removed is expected to begin meeting within the week, Cadmus said. According to board policy, the committee may take up to 30 days to review the complaint and decide on its educational appropriateness and its suitably for fourth and fifth grade readers.

The Menifee Union School District is holding a regularly scheduled board meeting at 4:30 p.m. Tuesday at Hans Christensen Middle School, located at 27625 Sherman Rd. in Menifee. Though the dictionary in question is not on the board’s agenda, a public comment time will occur near the start of the meeting.

“We always welcome the public’s comments,” Cadmus said.

Related story: Menifee USD pulls dictionaries due to explicit word

Maggie Avants is the education editor at SWRNN.com. Follow her @SWRNNedu.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

SHARE THIS POST

READER COMMENTS

12 comments


Comment by: Peyton Farquhar Posted: January 26, 2010, 11:52 am

It is *beyond* mind-boggling that *one* parent has the power to command the removal of *any* educational materials from a school district. What’s next on that parent’s agenda – a book burning pep rally to remove certain titles from the library that s/he does not approve of? To say this is outrageous does not go far enough.

Comment by: Joette Posted: January 26, 2010, 1:44 pm

“On that theory, you would only have ‘Dick and Jane’ left in the library.”

Incorrect…I have an elementary aged son who giggles about the name “Dick” every time he sees one of the early primers.

Comment by: Pattie Posted: January 26, 2010, 2:16 pm

I have a HUSBAND who giggles about the name “Dick”!! I have fond memories of the dictionary– looking up words like “cunnilinigus” and “felatio” and laughing like hell with my girl friends. Kids are silly. Adults are just plain stupid!

Comment by: Karen Posted: January 26, 2010, 2:27 pm

Well… was it a PICTURE dictionary?

Comment by: Joel Gunch Posted: January 26, 2010, 3:25 pm

Pattie, you wouldn’t find those words since they are spelled “cunnilingus” and “fellatio.”

“Sodomy” and “pederasty” also appear in standard dictionaries, as well as in the lyrics of a popular Broadway musical called _Hair._

Comment by: BP Posted: January 26, 2010, 5:35 pm

Are we so naive to believe that human children throughout history had no exposure to sex living in one-room huts or caves with their parents? Why is it now unhealthy for today’s children to be aware of sex from an early age as our ancestors were? Who should have the right to make sex evil in the eyes of our children?

Comment by: Serrano Posted: January 26, 2010, 5:35 pm

Censorship in any form is wrong and it appears to me that this is just that. How could one parent with questionable intelligence cause such a inane ruckus? Children at any age have a right to know information. There is no “age appropriate” time to learn . . . this or anything else. Lack of knowledge is what gets children into trouble. Sounds like Menifee had better get a reality check.

Comment by: SM Posted: January 26, 2010, 8:20 pm

This woman, Betti Cadmus, is a misguided liar, and she knows it. She is backpedaling now, having realized that the district made a horrible mistake. Menifee school district needs more than a reality check. They need to get rid of the superintendent, the assistant and anyone else involved in this blatant example of censorship. How stupid does Cadmus and others think we are? She cautions that the dictionaries haven’t been banned, they’ve just been “removed from use.” Okay. Well, Cadmus, you’re not an idiot, its just that your brain has been removed from use, temporarily.

Comment by: Teacher Lygia Posted: January 27, 2010, 3:43 am

Totally agree with all of you, guys above.
Besides this, children must know words since their curiosity pop up in their very early age. Some kids come up with questions earlier than others and we’ve got to give them the due respect and be objective and serious about our answers to their questions and doubts. There’s nothing to be with what you look up in the dictionary. There is a point on letting kids know what they need with support, affection, love.
So, yes, Karen, Joel Gunch, BP, Serrano,and SM, each of you wrote a little about what I was going to say here.

Comment by: Dottie P. Posted: January 27, 2010, 8:26 am

Let me get the story straight: Mother-of-the-Year went to the school principal with a written complaint about the term “oral sex” being included in the dictionary used in her son’s classroom.

But, the term “oral sex” does not appear in that dictionary.

However, this does not cause the Wise Administrators in this school / district to drop the matter on the grounds that Mother-of-the-Year clearly has some cognitive issues.

The Wise Administrators hastily investigate the bogus complaint, and find that the big, bad dictionary does indeed contain some words that make them feel tickly.

So, to prevent the children from going to hell(or perhaps, even worse, going to Mother-of-the-Year and asking her for an explanation…)because they’ve let their little eyeballs linger on those nasty, unembellished, clinical definitions, they take away the dictionaries.

*sigh* The road to hell is paved with Merriam and Webster’s…

Comment by: LaLucha Posted: January 27, 2010, 11:43 am

I was in fourth grade and done with all my work. I looked up “braw”, but could not find it in the dictionary. I also looked up “penis”, and there was an anatomical drawing. This is a normal educational activity. A dictionary gives a child freedom to explore words and our language. As it stands, these dictionaries do not get used near enough. That poor kid probably wishes his mom would go read a book, or play tennis, or get some friends to hang out with. Hovering, helicopter moms cause their sons to hate women.

Comment by: Edie Posted: February 1, 2010, 7:05 am

Keep the dictionaries, remove the parents!!!
The internet does the same thing so let’s remove all computers from schools.

POST A COMMENT

* Required to comment