Kalshi Netherlands became, briefly, a media story about a company that supposedly dodged a ban. In 2026, a Dutch television segment reported that regulators had shut Polymarket out of the country while Kalshi kept operating unbothered — and the Dutch gambling authority had to step in and say that was not an accurate read of its own ruling.
What the KSA Actually Fined Polymarket For
The Kansspelautoriteit (KSA) issued a last onder dwangsom — a penalty order — against Adventure One QSS Inc., the company behind Polymarket, on February 17, 2026. The trigger was a Dutch coalition-formation political market that had reportedly drawn roughly $32 million in wagers. The order gave Polymarket a deadline to block Dutch users or start accruing €420,000 per week, capped at €840,000. Polymarket blocked access a day late and was still hit with a separate collection decision over that missed day. Adventure One filed a formal appeal on March 2, 2026; the KSA rejected it on June 23 (decision published July 8), and the fine stands in full.
The fine is real. The distinction TV drew is not. The KSA has said plainly that comparable platforms — naming Kalshi specifically — fall under its supervision and can be sanctioned the same way, whether or not a case has been opened against each one individually. No enforcement order yet is not a finding of legality.
Is Kalshi Legal in the Netherlands? What the KSA Says the Law Covers
Dutch online gambling runs through the Wet kansspelen op afstand (Koa Act), in force since October 2021, with the KSA as the sole licensing and enforcement body for the online market. Nothing in that framework was drafted with event-contract exchanges in mind, but the KSA’s reading is the same one European regulators have converged on elsewhere: staking money on an uncertain future outcome is gambling under Dutch law regardless of what the operator calls the product. The KSA’s licensing director, Ella Seijsener, has stated the political-betting piece of that even more bluntly — betting on political events is always prohibited in the Netherlands, even for an operator that already holds a Dutch gambling licence. Kalshi holds no Dutch licence at all.
Why the TV Report Got It Backwards
The broadcast segment treated Polymarket’s fine as proof Kalshi had been cleared. Dutch casino-industry press corrected that within days, pointing back to the KSA’s own language: prediction markets “such as Polymarket and Kalshi” fall under gambling regulation, and “comparable sites also fall under KSA supervision” — language that names Kalshi directly rather than leaving it to inference. What actually separates the two platforms in the Netherlands right now is sequencing: Polymarket drew the KSA’s first enforcement action because of a specific, high-visibility political market. Kalshi has not drawn a matching order yet. That is an enforcement queue, not a legal opinion in Kalshi’s favor.
What’s actually true right now:
- Polymarket: fined €420,000 Feb 2026, appeal rejected July 2026, must block Dutch users
- Kalshi: no fine issued yet, but named by the KSA as falling under the same supervision
- Neither platform holds a Dutch KSA licence
Kalshi Is Still Listing Dutch-Relevant Markets
Unlike Polymarket after its February order, Kalshi has not blocked Dutch users and, as of this writing, continues to list contracts tied to Dutch subject matter — Eredivisie football fixtures and Dutch national elections among them. That is the practical gap between the two platforms right now: one has been forced to wall off the country, the other has not been forced to do anything yet. It is not evidence the second platform is in the clear.
Is Kalshi Legit, and Is It Safe to Use From the Netherlands?
Legit as a company: yes. Kalshi is a CFTC-designated US exchange with real identity verification, not an offshore shell — the KSA’s objection is about licensing in the Netherlands, not about whether Kalshi is a scam. Safe to use from a Dutch connection: no. Kalshi’s own signup requires a US government ID and US bank account, which already blocks a normal Dutch account opening, and even setting that aside, there is no KSA oversight, no coverage under Cruks (the Dutch self-exclusion register that only reaches licensed operators), and no local complaints channel if a market settles in a way a trader disputes.
None of this is a way to make money regardless of which platform a reader picks. Event contracts can cost a trader the full price paid for them, and for someone in the Netherlands the more useful fact isn’t which platform got fined first — it’s that the KSA has said both are unlicensed gambling, and one enforcement order does not mean the other platform cleared anything.