Best online sportsbook Chile doesn't have a licensed answer the way its neighbors do. Argentina has two brands with real provincial licenses; Colombia has one Coljuegos concession. Chile has zero — of the brands this site reviews, not a single one holds Chilean authorization, and since September 2025 that gap has turned into an active blocking order rather than a quiet legal gray zone.
The September 2025 Ruling That Changed Everything
On September 29, 2025, the Third Chamber of Chile's Supreme Court heard a case brought by Lotería de Concepción against six major internet providers — Claro, Entel, GTD, Telefónica, WOM, and VTR — and ruled that online gambling is illegal in Chile unless a specific law authorizes it. The court ordered the providers to block access to unauthorized betting sites, extending a legal theory previously used against malware and child-exploitation content to cover unlicensed gambling instead. Today, only three entities hold express authorization for any online wagering product: Polla Chilena de Beneficencia, Lotería de Concepción, and the horse-racing platform Teletrak.
What's actually authorized in Chile
- Polla Chilena de Beneficencia — state lottery and sports-pool betting
- Lotería de Concepción — the entity that won the September 2025 ruling
- Teletrak — online horse-race wagering
- Everyone else reviewed on this site: zero Chilean licenses
Kalshi and Polymarket: Not Blocked, Not Approved Either
A Subtel enforcement round reported by at least one industry weekly covering late August into early September 2026 named roughly 42 domains for DNS-level blocking — Betano, Coolbet, Betsson, Stake, and mirror URLs tied to bet365 among them. Kalshi and Polymarket are absent from that list, and neither restricts Chile on its own member-agreement terms. That's a function of how the ruling and the blocklist are built: both target sportsbooks and online casinos taking bets on sporting events, not platforms listing event contracts under federal commodities-style frameworks. A Chilean visitor can reach either site today without a VPN — which is an enforcement gap, not a government endorsement.
The same gap that protects Kalshi and Polymarket today could close fast. Chile's Supreme Court already proved willing to extend a blocking theory built for malware onto ordinary offshore sportsbooks. Nothing about that reasoning is permanently incompatible with event-contract platforms — it simply hasn't been tested against one yet.
bet365, BetOnline.ag, and Bovada: Three Flavors of Restricted
bet365's mirror domains reportedly landed in the 2026 blocklist round, which is the most direct enforcement action of the three. BetOnline.ag hasn't been named specifically in any source this research found, but it holds nothing beyond a Panama Gaming Control Board registration Chile's SCJ doesn't recognize, which puts it squarely inside the activity the September 2025 ruling covers regardless of whether its domain has been added yet. Bovada is the odd case: it isn't blocked because it never tried to be reachable — Harp Media B.V. withdrew Bovada from all of Latin America back in 2018 and has run it as a US-only brand ever since.
DraftKings: The One Name That Never Showed Up
DraftKings doesn't appear in Chile's regulatory record, the Subtel blocklist, or the committee hearings for Boletín 14838-03, the pending online-betting bill. Its own 2026 disclosures describe a live sportsbook and casino footprint limited to roughly 27 US states plus Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, Ontario, and Alberta. Chile was never part of that map.
Ranked by what actually survives contact with Chile's blocking regime: Kalshi and Polymarket first, simply because the rule as written doesn't reach them yet; BetOnline.ag next, unlicensed but not confirmed blocked; Bovada self-excluded regardless; bet365 reportedly caught in the 2026 sweep; DraftKings absent from the country entirely. None of it is a way to make money — it's 18+ entertainment with a house edge, licensed nowhere on this list and blocked on more of it every year.
The short list
- 1. Kalshi — Not named in the blocklist, not restricted by its own rules
Chile's September 2025 Supreme Court ruling and the Subtel blocklist that followed both target sportsbooks and casinos, not event-contract exchanges — Kalshi has never appeared on either. Its own October 2025 global expansion opened direct sign-up to roughly 140 countries, Chile included, by checking a restricted-jurisdiction list that doesn't name it.
- 2. Polymarket — Reachable without a VPN, same reason as Kalshi
Chile never named Polymarket in the ISP blocklist, and Polymarket's own restricted-country list — which already covers Argentina and Colombia after separate 2025–2026 court and regulator actions — doesn't include Chile either. A Chilean visitor can load polymarket.com today; that's an absence of enforcement, not a legal green light.
- 3. BetOnline.ag — Unlicensed and exposed, but not confirmed on the blocklist
Holds only a Panama Gaming Control Board registration Chile's SCJ doesn't recognize, and operates squarely inside the activity the September 2025 ruling calls illegal. This research found no source naming BetOnline.ag specifically among the ~42 domains in the 2026 Subtel round — but the court's reasoning applies to any unauthorized platform, named or not.
- 4. Bovada — Unreachable regardless — self-excluded since 2018
Harp Media B.V. pulled Bovada out of every Latin American market in 2018 and has operated it strictly for US players since, so Chile was already off the table before the Supreme Court ever ruled. Holds no Chilean authorization on top of that.
- 5. bet365 — Mirror domains reportedly swept into the 2026 blocklist
At least one industry weekly reported bet365 mirror URLs among the roughly 42 domains Subtel ordered blocked in the August–September 2026 enforcement round, alongside Betano, Coolbet, Betsson, and Stake. No Chilean license exists for bet365 to fall back on.
- 6. DraftKings — Never entered the market, blocklist or no blocklist
Doesn't appear in Chile's regulatory record, the Subtel blocklist, or Boletín 14838-03's committee hearings. DraftKings' own 2026 disclosures describe a live footprint limited to US states plus DC, Puerto Rico, Ontario, and Alberta — Chile was never part of the plan.
The honest verdict
There is no best-licensed pick in Chile, because Chile has no online sportsbook license to hold — only Polla Chilena de Beneficencia, Lotería de Concepción, and the horse-racing platform Teletrak carry express authorization, and none of those three are brands this site reviews. Everything else sits on one side of a blocking order that didn't exist two years ago. On September 29, 2025, the Third Chamber of Chile's Supreme Court sided with Lotería de Concepción in a case against the country's major ISPs — Claro, Entel, GTD, Telefónica, WOM, and VTR — ruling that online gambling is illegal unless a law expressly authorizes it, and ordering the providers to block unauthorized sites. A later Subtel enforcement round, reported by at least one industry weekly covering late August and early September 2026, named roughly 42 domains for DNS-level blocking, including Betano, Coolbet, Betsson, Stake, and mirror URLs tied to bet365. Bovada and BetOnline.ag are both restricted for overlapping reasons: Bovada pulled out of Latin America entirely in 2018 and has run as a US-only brand since, so Chile was unreachable before the court ever ruled, while BetOnline.ag holds nothing but a Panama Gaming Control Board registration Chile doesn't recognize and operates in the same legal gray-turned-illegal zone the ruling targets, even though this research found no source naming it specifically among the blocked domains. DraftKings never pursued Chile at all — its own 2026 disclosures list a footprint of 27 US states plus DC, Puerto Rico, Ontario, and Alberta, full stop. Kalshi and Polymarket are the two names actually left standing: neither appeared in the Subtel blocklist, and neither restricts Chile on its own member-agreement list — a Chilean visitor can reach either site today without a VPN, not because a regulator approved them, but because Chile's betting law was written for sportsbooks and casinos, not CFTC-style event contracts. A bill, Boletín 14838-03, that would finally create a real Chilean online-betting license cleared the Senate in general 27-3 and got the country's highest legislative urgency in May 2026, but it stalled in committee and, as written, wouldn't resolve Kalshi or Polymarket's status even if it passed. None of this is a way to make money — it's 18+ entertainment with a house edge, whichever side of the blocklist a brand happens to sit on.
Questions this list actually answers
What is the best online sportsbook in Chile?
None of the brands this site reviews holds a Chilean license, because Chile only authorizes Polla Chilena de Beneficencia, Lotería de Concepción, and Teletrak for online gambling. Of the rest, Kalshi and Polymarket are the only two that haven't been swept into Chile's ISP blocklist or named in the September 2025 Supreme Court ruling — which isn't the same thing as being endorsed.
Is online sports betting legal in Chile?
Not for any offshore sportsbook. On September 29, 2025, the Third Chamber of Chile's Supreme Court ruled that online gambling is illegal unless a law expressly authorizes it, siding with Lotería de Concepción against the country's major internet providers and ordering them to block unauthorized sites. A pending bill, Boletín 14838-03, would create Chile's first real online-betting license, but it has stalled in Senate committee as of mid-2026.
Is bet365 legal in Chile?
No. bet365 holds no Chilean license, and at least one industry report found its mirror domains among the roughly 42 sites Subtel ordered blocked in a 2026 enforcement round that also named Betano, Coolbet, Betsson, and Stake. There is no official Chilean government list confirming this independently, but there is also no license bet365 could point to instead.
Why aren’t Kalshi and Polymarket blocked in Chile like the sportsbooks?
Because Chile's Supreme Court ruling and the Subtel blocklist that followed it were built around sportsbooks and online casinos — platforms that take bets on sporting events. Kalshi and Polymarket list event contracts under a different legal theory, and neither has been named in the ruling, the blocklist, or restricted by Chile on their own member-agreement lists. That's a gap in how the rule was written, not a government approval.
Can I use Bovada or DraftKings for sports betting in Chile?
Not legitimately, for different reasons. Bovada excluded all of Latin America, Chile included, back in 2018 and runs strictly for US players today, so there's no signup path regardless of the 2025 ruling. DraftKings simply never pursued Chile — its 2026 regulatory filings list only US states plus DC, Puerto Rico, Ontario, and Alberta as live markets.
Will Chile ever license online sportsbooks?
Possibly, but not yet. Boletín 14838-03 passed the Chilean Senate in general by a 27-3 vote and received the government's highest legislative urgency in May 2026, which would create a real Superintendencia de Casinos, Apuestas y Juegos de Azar with online licensing power. It has since stalled under hundreds of pages of proposed committee amendments, and most industry observers don't expect final passage before the end of 2026.